acrylic on canvas, 2014, 70 x 100 cm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview
Neostasi is a 2012 acrylic painting on canvas by Belgian artist Jan Theuninck (born 1954 in Zonnebeke, West Flanders). Measuring 70 x 100 cm, it exemplifies Theuninck's abstract style, blending minimalism with monochrome expressionism. The work critiques modern surveillance and totalitarian control, drawing parallels to the East German Stasi (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit). "Neostasi" evokes "neo-Stasi," symbolizing contemporary psychological and chemical oppression techniques, such as Zersetzung (a Stasi method of "decomposition" through covert harassment).The painting was created amid Theuninck's personal experiences of alleged state persecution, including "more than 50 years of misery with blackmail games of the services and torture practices with chemical and energy weapons." It fits into a series addressing Western totalitarianism's evolution, from Third Way politics to post-truth societies.Themes and Context
Theuninck's oeuvre often explores authoritarianism, informed by his visits to sites like Auschwitz and his poetry (written in French and English). Neostasi references how Stasi tactics persist today: nonconformity labeled as mental illness, enforced via psychotropic weapons. Accompanying notes highlight: "Today Stasi agents use psychotropic/chemical/pharmaceutical weapons e.g. nonconformity and freethinking now considered mental illness."This piece follows The Culture of Learned Helplessness (2011) and precedes Derailed System (2012), part of a broader critique including Zersetzung (2014), Brainwashing (2018), and Political Pandemic (2021). Theuninck has shared it on X (formerly Twitter) to comment on events like COVID policies, Angela Merkel's Stasi files, and media surveillance, often quoting his 2009 remark: "We defeated the Soviets, now a Stasi culture devours Europe."
Zersetzung: The Stasi's Psychological Warfare TechniqueZersetzung (German for "decomposition" or "disruption") was a covert psychological operation developed and systematically deployed by the East German Ministry for State Security (Stasi) from the mid-1970s through the 1980s. It served as a non-violent alternative to arrests or imprisonment, allowing the regime to neutralize perceived political opponents—such as dissidents, intellectuals, activists, and even ordinary citizens suspected of "hostile-negative" attitudes—while maintaining a facade of normalcy and avoiding international scrutiny. Unlike overt repression, Zersetzung aimed to "decompose" the target's life from within, eroding their mental stability, social ties, and will to resist without leaving traceable evidence of state involvement.Historical ContextThe technique emerged under Erich Honecker's leadership after 1971, as the German Democratic Republic (GDR) sought to soften its image post-Berlin Wall construction and amid détente with the West, including the 1972 Basic Treaty and 1975 Helsinki Accords. Directive No. 1/76, issued by Stasi head Erich Mielke in January 1976, formalized Zersetzung as a core tactic, drawing on earlier informal practices from the 1950s. The Stasi, with its vast network of 170,000–500,000 unofficial collaborators (Inoffizielle Mitarbeiter or IMs)—including informants as young as 14—gathered intimate details to tailor operations. By the late 1980s, it was applied in 4,500–5,000 cases annually, affecting an estimated 300,000–500,000 people overall through Stasi repression. Post-1989 reunification, victims gained access to Stasi files, revealing the scale, though many operations were vaguely documented or partially executed.The term "Zersetzung" originated in Nazi-era military law ("Wehrkraftzersetzung") for undermining morale, punishable by death, but the Stasi repurposed it for subtle, deniable subversion. It aligned with Leninist ideas of infiltrating and corroding bourgeois structures, as later echoed by figures like former German intelligence chief Hans-Georg Maaßen.
GoalsZersetzung's objective was preventive repression: to preempt "hostile" activities by inducing self-doubt, isolation, and paralysis. For individuals, it sought to "switch off" efficacy by exploiting personal vulnerabilities (e.g., via psychograms profiling traits like insecurities or sexual orientation). For groups (e.g., peace circles, punk scenes, or Jehovah's Witnesses), it aimed to sow discord, fragment unity, and erode trust through rumors of infiltration. Ultimately, it created a climate of pervasive paranoia, where targets questioned their sanity and abandoned opposition, reinforcing the regime's control without mass incarceration.Specific TechniquesOperations were meticulously planned using surveillance data from Stasi departments like Linie III (observation) and Abteilung 26 (wiretapping). Tactics were "pseudo-scientific," often gaslighting-like, and categorized in Mielke's 1976 directive as measures to discredit, provoke, or sabotage.
Psychological ImpactsZersetzung inflicted profound, long-term trauma, often driving victims to "learned helplessness" or suicide ideation. Targets reported paranoia, eroded self-esteem, social isolation, and a pervasive sense of madness—effects amplified by the technique's deniability, making victims doubt their perceptions. Writer Jürgen Fuchs called it an "assault on the human soul," while up to 5,000–10,000 victims suffered permanent mental damage. Post-reunification, many faced disbelief from society, hindering compensation claims; a 2019 German law provided €1,500 one-off payments and career adjustments, but burdens of proof persist.Modern Parallels and EvolutionsZersetzung's legacy endures in contemporary authoritarian tactics. In Russia under Vladimir Putin, FSB agents have reportedly used similar harassment—home intrusions, object tampering—against diplomats and journalists since 2016. Digital adaptations include algorithmic surveillance, disinformation campaigns, and "no-touch torture" via psychotropic or energy-based claims, echoing Stasi methods in hybrid regimes. Artists like Jan Theuninck have visualized these evolutions in works such as Zersetzung (2014), portraying "chemical and energetical weapons" as extensions of Stasi-era "no-touch torture," linking it to modern surveillance states and political "psychoterror." As Theuninck noted in 2009 (reiterated in 2024), "We defeated the Soviets, [but] a Stasi culture devours Europe."
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
The Stasi perfected the technique of psychological harassment of perceived enemies known as Zersetzung – a term borrowed from chemistry which literally means "corrosion" or "undermining".
By the 1970s, the Stasi had decided that methods of overt persecution which had been employed up to that time, such as arrest and torture, were too crude and obvious. It was realised that psychological harassment was far less likely to be recognised for what it was, so its victims, and their supporters, were less likely to be provoked into active resistance, given that they would often not be aware of the source of their problems, or even its exact nature. Zersetzung was designed to side-track and "switch off" perceived enemies so that they would lose the will to continue any "inappropriate" activities.
Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim’s private or family life. This often included psychological attacks such as breaking into homes and messing with the contents – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included property damage, sabotage of cars, purposely incorrect medical treatment, smear campaigns including sending falsified compromising photos or documents to the victim's family, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a target's wife. Usually victims had no idea the Stasi were responsible. Many thought they were losing their minds, and mental breakdowns and suicide could result.
We defeated the Soviets, meanwhile a Stasi culture engulfs Europe... (Jan Theuninck, August 2009)
Nonconformity and Freethinking Now Considered Mental Illnesses
Aldous Huxley in 1958 : people in fear are very easy to control
the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence
new technologies e.g.Active Denial Sustem, etc
